| 0 | 0 | ||
<p><img width="1400" height="1050" src="https://www.musictech.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/PPG-Wave-2@1400x1050.jpg" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="PPG Wave 2" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.musictech.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/PPG-Wave-2@1400x1050.jpg 1400w, https://www.musictech.net/wp-content/upl...00x300.jpg 400w, https://www.musictech.net/wp-content/upl...00x600.jpg 800w, https://www.musictech.net/wp-content/upl...96x522.jpg 696w, https://www.musictech.net/wp-content/upl...2x1044.jpg 1392w, https://www.musictech.net/wp-content/upl...68x801.jpg 1068w" sizes="(max-width: 1400px) 100vw, 1400px" /></p>
<p>Faced with the conundrum of dragging analogue devotees into the early digital age, PPG rode the crest of a new wave…</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.musictech.net/features/opinion-analysis/vintage-rewind-ppg-wave-2/">Vintage Rewind: PPG Wave 2</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.musictech.net">MusicTech</a>.</p>
https://www.musictech.net/features/opini...ppg-wave-2
![[-]](http://www.n01ze.com/synthwizards/Forum/images/Carbon/collapse.png "[-]")
