0 | 0 | ||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Many describe the ml sound like thin or cold, sterile of some sort and I can only agree. While this helps in the mix with harsh sounds its hard for me to dial in those smooth pianos. </p> <p>I tried with the MF as direct comparison with no effects. On the MF I can use pretty much anything and tune it to those soft pianos with a pleasant mid end. On the ML its different, even when I use just a sine from the digital I cant get it too "fill the gap". Same from the analogue oscs with different amount of filtering and the most clean shapes without the overtones.</p> <p>Its a bit like they lowered 800 hz or sthg so the noobs got it easier while mixing </p> <p>The only thing that works is a lot of resonance to fill in the empty spot with the filter set at the right frequency. </p> <p>Any thoughts? I mean its capable of a lot of interesting sounds but it seems kind of pre eqed.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/BKLronin"> /u/BKLronin </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/synthesizers/comments/v8rjk7/minilogue_xd_and_the_quest_for_warm_epianoish/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/synthesizers/comments/v8rjk7/minilogue_xd_and_the_quest_for_warm_epianoish/">[comments]</a></span>